Is there too much AI flavor in the paper? These 6 GPT-5 core instructions to remove AI traces

With the rapid advancement of AI technology, AI has entered into the academia. Many people now depend on AI writing to finish papers. To ensure academic rigor, AIGC detection is now a fresh threshold in the academic circle. But there's nothing to fear for if you run into trouble, for there'll be ways out once problems show their face. The editor has conducted tests after actual operation, it was found that only when we master these 8 basic instructions can we conveniently operate GPT-5 to remove AI creation traces and use magic against magic just as to make our papers pass. Today I'm going to teach you how to "deeply beautify" your paper from six main dimensions using GPT-5 and get rid of those pesky AI-created marks.

1 Language style reconstruction

Instructions:

• please rephrase the next paragraph [AI highlighted in red] without changing its central idea: from here on, work toward making the professional temperament of the text stronger; imitate the writer's particular way with words, shifts among tones, and changes between sentences; to eliminate the mechanical expressions. Also, pay special attention to avoiding retaining too tight logical connections like what's seen often in articles written by AIs, but rather reflect those thinking gaps and natural rhythm changes as one writes.

2 Sentence expression reinforcement

Instructions:

• We should adjust the AI highlighted text below so that it contains the main idea and logic of the original text. We could add some explanation as supplementary explanations for key concepts or difficult arguments, but do not merely change words into their synonyms. It should instead be repeated expression by the author to clarify understanding, stress key points, smooth out writing, make it more personal and distinctive while not being too stiff.

3 Personalized thinking injection

Instructions:

• Please assist me in revising the paragraph [AI marked with red], requiring to preserve the primary viewpoint of the original text, but also incorporating the author's implicit reasoning procedures, like uncertainties about their own arguments during assertions, potential refutation directions, or incomplete explanations, so that there is evident personal contemplation within the text, and it should not come across as direct or straightforward; enhancing its critical and ideational layers while diminishing the AI generation aspect of this piece.

4 Sentence structure adjustment

Instructions:

• Please help me with a task, it is to rephrase this paragraph [highlighted in red]. But we can still keep the original meaning unchanged, changing the sentence organization. Some long sentences should also be present so that there is a certain length of long sentences to maintain complex logical coherence, while there are some short and neat ones as well. This isn't just a matter of transforming sentence structures; it involves making skillful use of nested compound sentences, flexibly handling interjections, and subtly adjusting tones to break away from the previous smooth narrative. The result was actually an author's written piece by a person rather than something made by AI, where logic remains tight yet has pauses and undulations as well. situations of coexistence.

5 Logical connection optimization

Instructions:

• Help me to reorganize the paragraph below. [AI highlighted paragraph] Please check if there is a logical break within each paragraph, between paragraphs and supplement the specific objects referred by Ming、Qing and Chu Pronouns such as this, it in order to make better transition and links between sentences, improve the content structure of article more compact and get rid of those cases that paragraphs are independent from one another with no connection and meaning not matching up.

6 Supplement to empirical details

Instructions:

• Please help me to revise the following paragraph [which is marked with red color]. Keeping the central theme of the paragraph, if there are abstract expressions or theoretical descriptions appearing in the text, they should be supported by more concrete details, real-life situations, and cases. More micro examples, observed phenomena or hypothetical scenarios could be used just as to make the arguments look more lively, vividly detailed, convincing, not too general nor empty.