Pass Turnitin with Confidence: The Ultimate AI Humanizer Strategy - 8 GPT-5 Revision Tips for High-Scoring Papers

Writing a high score paper is not an overnight task, but a process that requires us to polish it slowly and constantly revise and improve it. However, we often encounter some problems when revising the manuscript, such as the article's chaotic structure, empty content or irregular expression. When dealing with language problems, it is easy to ignore the logical sorting work, which leads to the final work not reaching the expected effect. In fact, if you want to improve the quality of your paper, you should grasp five key points: the overall structure and core content; From these aspects, we can improve all aspects of the article. Of course, we can also use AI technology to help us complete related tasks and achieve greater gains in a short time.

1 Overall framework of the paper

The overall framework should be planned well before writing and modifying. Only with a good structure can the paper be organized, such as whether there is a clear logical relationship between the research questions, theories, methods, results and conclusions. When revising, ask yourself several questions, such as is the framework of the article reasonable? Does chapter arrangement conform to academic norms? Is the theme prominent? Does it run through the full text? Are all parts designed to support the central argument? Is there any disconnection or jumping? Is the transition between paragraphs and chapters natural?

Prompt word 1:

Please comprehensively evaluate the rationality of the structure of my paper, focusing on these points: 1) whether the arrangement of each chapter conforms to the logical chain of the standard academic paper "Introduction literature review method result discussion conclusion"; 2) Whether there are redundant structures, repetitive contents, disordered chapters or fuzzy levels, 3) how well does the content of each chapter fit with the research question, and whether it is fully consistent, 4) whether it is necessary to add, delete or integrate some parts to strengthen the overall logic and structural cohesion of the paper; 5) It is necessary to point out the existing problems for each chapter and give clear suggestions on structural adjustment. If feasible, please provide a clearer and operable outline of the new paper architecture.

Prompt word 2:

Please make a comprehensive evaluation of whether the research questions in my thesis are clear, concentrated and throughout. Please make a judgment according to the following criteria: 1) whether the research questions are clearly put forward in the introduction and throughout the full text, 2) whether the research questions are too broad or unclear, or inconsistent with the research content, and 3) the degree of fit between the research questions and research methods, the presentation of research results and conclusions. 4) Specific and operable suggestions for modification are given, including but not limited to the requirements of narrowing the scope of research, focusing on research objects, and strengthening problem awareness, which are expressed in three parts: the first part is the existing problems, the second part is the revision strategy of research problems, and the third part is how to map the revised research problems into the chapters of the paper.

2 Core content level of the paper

The content is mostly based on the core of the paper. The key is to highlight the "research value". The summary part should explain clearly the shortcomings of previous studies, whether the theoretical framework can provide support for the whole research, and the research methods should be strict and consistent with the problems. As for the results and discussion part, it should be based on the data and theory. The conclusion should respond to the research problems, and point out the contribution and limitations of the research.

Prompt 3:

Please make a comprehensive evaluation of the enrichment and rationality of the literature review part of my paper. The specific contents to be checked include: whether the cited literature is representative and cutting-edge, whether there is the situation of citing outdated literature or lack of the latest research results; Whether the literature review is just a stack of literature, whether it has been sorted out and compared, including comparative analysis of different views, methods and conclusions, how relevant the literature citation is to the research problem, and whether the logical chain of "existing research - research gap - this research filling" can be clearly presented. Requirements: (1) list the main existing problems (such as repetition, lack of research gaps, and lack of organization); (2) Propose modification suggestions, such as what types of literature, directions or levels to supplement/replace, (3) generate an improved literature review outline (including subject division, research gaps, methodology comparison, etc.).

Prompt 4:

Please analyze the rationality and completeness of the theoretical framework of the paper, focusing on: 1) whether the core concepts and variables are clearly defined and used consistently in the research; 2) whether the adopted theories closely fit the research problems; 3) whether there are problems of insufficient theoretical interpretation, lack of a unified framework or logical basis; 4) the correspondence between the theory and research design, data analysis and result interpretation. Output requirements: 1) indicate the defects in the application of theory, such as vague concept, mismatch or insufficient coverage; 2) Put forward theoretical ideas that can be supplemented or replaced; 3) Give specific suggestions on how to better integrate the theory into the research questions, methods and conclusions.

3 Optimization of paper language expression

Language expression directly affects the professional level of the paper, so we should also pay attention to this part, mainly to avoid colloquialism and fuzziness, maintain a concise and refined style of writing, and ensure the coherence between paragraphs and sentences. For this part, we can think about the following questions: is the use of words professional enough in academic norms? Is there any improper colloquialism? Is it concise enough? Is there redundancy or duplication? In terms of coherence, is the coherence between sentences and paragraphs smooth? Is there any language defect in grammar and format? Is punctuation properly used?

Prompt 5:

Please check whether the language of the paper meets the academic writing standards: (1) whether there are colloquial, subjective and vague expressions, such as "I think", "many", "more important", etc; (2) Whether there are unprofessional or imprecise words, (3) whether it conforms to the academic writing style: objective, accurate, avoiding value judgment and emotional expression. Output requirements: (1) list the non-standard expressions and their paragraphs, (2) provide standard expressions; (3) Summarize the language style suggestions suitable for the subject (such as objective statements, use accurate terms, and avoid vague adjectives).

Prompt 6:

Whether the language of the paper is concise, please check: 1) whether there are long sentences? Is there a repeating paragraph? Is there any nonsense? 2) Is there a phenomenon that "you could have explained it in one sentence, but you have to write it in a long paragraph"? 3) Is the use of technical terms reasonable? Is there any abuse or redundancy? Requirements: 1) mark specific redundant sentences/paragraphs; 2) Give a simplified version of the expression; 3) Give summary suggestions and tell the author how to simplify the text as a whole to make the paper more compact.

4 Paper format and details

Prompt 7:

Please check whether the references of the paper are complete and standardized according to the article, including: 1) whether there is any inconsistency between the text quotation and the list of references; 2) Whether the citation format is uniform (such as APA 7th Edition, MLA, Chicago, etc.), including punctuation marks, author name, year of publication, page number and other details are correct; 3) Whether there is any problem of missing source, repeated reference or nonstandard reference format (such as improper use of "et al.). Specific requirements: 1 Mark the problem and location of incomplete references, provide examples of correct reference standard writing, and sort out a "reference revision guide" as the basis for global adjustment

Prompt 8:

Please judge whether the abstract and key words of the paper meet the specifications and are accurate. The main check points include: ① whether the abstract covers the research background, purpose, methods, main findings and conclusions; ② whether there are references, abbreviations or ambiguity in the abstract; ③ Whether the key words include the main research topics and methods, and meet the requirements of the conventional number (generally 3-6), ④ whether the number of words in the abstract conforms to the regulations of the target journal or the school. The output should include: 1) a list of questions about the abstract and keywords (lack of key information/nonstandard expression, etc.), 2) suggestions on the revision of the abstract (it is necessary to specify how to adjust the wording and what to add), 3) examples of abstracts and keywords of academic norms.